Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newport Worship Band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Newport Worship Band[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable group, doesn't meet WP:BAND, no substantial independent coverage. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom —Мандичка^YO 😜 11:16, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet GNG. CerealKillerYum (talk) 13:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete doesn't meet any notability criteria.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 06:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Evidence has provided that they meet GNG and also WP:BAND. While consensus is not a vote, I must change my vote upon review of the evidence.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 05:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has received significant coverage in Hallels.com (here and here) and Cross Rhythms (here and here). The album Paradise has charted on a Billboard chart, but I don't know which one, as the Billboard entry is incomplete (as the entries often are on that site).--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 14:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which of the Billboard charts I can't say for sure, But I note that the article came out on March 31 and Billboards shows it on the charts for 9 weeks.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 03:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per GNG above by 3family6, as well as, the song, "Echo", by Newport charting on two Billboard magazine charts.The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:NBAND, among various other shortcomings. Quis separabit? 12:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 01:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have already voted keep based on some reliable sources that I provided. I would add this feature on a local radio station as an additional source. With three different reliable sources talking about this band, I believe that notability concerns should be satisfied. I'm sure that there are more sources, but those sources might be difficult to find with a Google Search (a lot irrelevant info comes up in the searches I've done, so that makes it even harder).--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I suppose - I was contemplating a few minutes of what to say and I suppose for a religious group local to an area the sources are acceptable although there could be better (the album is new so maybe future projects will get coverage also). SwisterTwister talk 00:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:GNG. Flat Out (talk) 03:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.