Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NOWSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Graham87 14:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

NOWSA

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

NOWSA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough for Wikipedia, no matter how laudible it may be; the fact that the article is probably mistitled is the least of its problems. I found this page because of this attempt to de-orphan it; the fact that such lengths need to be taken at all shows that it doesn't fit on the site. I can't find much in the way of secondary sources either; I could only find *one* non-trivial mention in the Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre, which contains articles from many major Australian newspapers/magazines from 2000 onwards, and it's a surface-level treatment of the 2010 conference by the Newcastle Herald (the newspaper of the host city) entitled ""Women's voices to be heard". The article was created by Mysteriousity, whose only other edits (20 out of 90!) are to the page Humanitarian Crisis Hub, which was speedily deleted as spam. Graham87 10:46, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator, this clearly isn't going anywhere and there are enough good sources to make this article viable. Graham87 14:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 10:56, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

• Keep. Significant, long-running (correctly-titled!) national conference. I've never heard of the "Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre", but it only took me a minute to find coverage like this profile in The Age. The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  • The article's called "Young feminism alive and kicking", for those like me who can't access it via the above link (it's probably available in ProQuest/other Wikipedia Library places. I've added in a link to this page at [[Feminism in Australia#Support groups and societies (which seems much more appropriate), so the page is no longer orphaned. I have some ideas for cleaning up this article (some of the weakly sourced blow-by-blow descriptions of the conference seem excessive), but I'll keep this open a little while longer to see what happens. Graham87 13:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
• Keep if the profile mentioned above is sufficient, and/or if further sources can be found. JesseW, the juggling janitor 14:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.