Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of demon lords in Dungeons & Dragons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:23, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of demon lords in Dungeons & Dragons[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Collection of trivial characters that don't need coverage, neither establishing notability or justifying itself as a spinout. Demon lord (Dungeons & Dragons), although it should likely be deleted as well, already has a complete list on the topic as well, so this is also just redundant plot information. TTN (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:25, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Almost entirely comprised of plot information, and sourced only to primary material. The vast majority of the individuals here are not remotely notable (a number of these are specified as only having been mentioned once in a list in a single book), and the topic fails WP:LISTN. It is also completely duplicative of Demon lord (Dungeons & Dragons), though as mentioned in the nom, that article pretty much has the exact same issues this one does. Rorshacma (talk) 17:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:LISTN, WP:RS, and WP:PRIMARY. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 23:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- this is excessive fancruft. As pointed out by Rorshacma, the topic fails WP:LISTN. The presentation also falls foul of WP:NOTDIR. Reyk _YO! 01:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Demon lord (Dungeons & Dragons), which, in point of fact, includes a list of them. BD2412 T 03:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:14, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficient WP:RS to demonstrate it passes the GNG Chetsford (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Primarily referenced by WP:PRIMARY sources. Trivial, in-universe material. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 08:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As listcruft that fails WP:LISTN. No apparent need to redirect._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete List cruft with excessive trival plot infomation. Fails WP:LISTN. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 17:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.