Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of alpha emitting materials
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep DES (talk) 06:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of alpha emitting materials[edit]
Pointless and misleading. The information, which nuclids are alpha emitters, is contained in the articles of the elements. Generating a list from that would give a rather unreadable list with hundreds of entries. --Pjacobi 18:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A table with the necessary hundreds of listings would at least be useful and accurate--this lists only 6 elements, and wouldnt be any help to a proper articleDGG 20:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and add in the energy of the particles, and sort them by energy. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 02:16, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Such a list could be useful if expanded. The current version is not more than a stub, but that's no reason to delete. --Itub 13:52, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand, although it's a clumsy structure to expand, further sorting of the information with this expansion would bring marked improvement in usefulness. Elmo 13:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. In the present form, the article is IMO to be deleted or eventually merged to Alpha particle as a list of examples. If someone decides to work on the article and put the energies, activity, half-times and things like that, I would be for keep. --Tone 14:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.