Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kos-
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice towards recreation of an article in the style proposed by Uanfala. Daniel (talk) 11:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Kos-[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kos- (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Simply being part of a place name is most definitely not what a disambiguation page is for. This is the most partial list of partial matches that I've ever encountered. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:12, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It's likely that the prefix in most of these entries does not mean blackbird. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:04, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- That doesn't work as a dab page, but could there be enough material out there for a toponymy article (like one of those)? – Uanfala (talk) 21:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.