Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kisna Diamond Jewellery (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 01:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kisna Diamond Jewellery[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All I'm seeing are press releases and trade pubs that don't meet WP:GNG. TLA (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: – this was previously speedy deleted for blatant advertising. TLA (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 01:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like promotional article with many sources showing 404 errors and others might consider unreliable. This article does not have any beneficial contribution and does not warrant significant notability.RangersRus (talk) 02:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: They opened a store in Rajput and the like, are about all I find for the company. Sourcing used now in the article is trade magazines/websites, not an acceptable source. Oaktree b (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NCORP Devokewater|(tαlk) 11:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.