Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kataxenna Kova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 05:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kataxenna Kova[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repost of material previously deleted and salted at Kataxenna/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kataxenna * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Fashion, Sexuality and gender, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : Subject fails WP:GNG. She doesn’t seem to be notable. --Meligirl5 (talk) 09:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Despite the WP:OVERKILL of citations, there is actually little of merit, if at all. We have one kamikaze account creating this purely promotional text and another one "curating" it. Such shenanigans rarely help.

Forensics without pain: promotional interviews such as this or this; advertorials, such as this; typical listings in models' listings, e.g. this one (all this bandwidth crop amounts to is to verify our subject is indeed a model); a news item, from a website called BLURB, about a book that, among many other models contains pics of our subject; typical announcements of events in local media, e.g. here; and so much more of the same. There is truly nothing out there. -The Gnome (talk) 15:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.