Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Benlevi-Zeff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:02, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Benlevi-Zeff[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional bio with no actual claim to notability. Being a guest speaker at notable institutions, or presenting notable people, does not confer notability. Sources are mainly primary, or they talk about her website and not about her. bonadea contributions talk 09:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 18:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This person is clearly a social-media whiz because she's on EVERYTHING, even music sites (and there's no evidence that she has anything to do with music). However, I can't figure out what it is that she does "as a business" perhaps because "expert in the digital recommendation space" is pretty vague. In any case, I found no reliable sources, only social media. When I tried searching on her business (JULIB) I got very very few hits - a handful. And the only non-social media was a PRNewsWire article. LaMona (talk) 18:35, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none of this suggests a better article yet. SwisterTwister talk 18:51, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. My searches for sources returned mostly press releases like this and this.
There is insufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Julie Benlevi-Zeff to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 01:48, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.