Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joulepoint

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joulepoint[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Press releases do not make a notable article. Sohom (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Andhra Pradesh. Sohom (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note to self, Hyderabad is not in Andhra Pradesh anymore you dummy Sohom (talk) 18:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions. Sohom (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What makes the article not meet the General Notability Guideline? It is a burgeoning EV development company in India. The company partners with the central government there as well as the railways (also managed by the central government), it provides the same function as Chargepoint, but in India Thistheyear2023 (talk) 00:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, in short, we don't care about anything other than if the company has reliable, in-depth, third party sources covering it, in this case, almost every source you have added is a press release and I could not find anything else of note while looking for additional sourcing, thus my statement at the start pointing out that the article is potentially non-notable Sohom (talk) 18:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I am not seeing significant coverage even after a Google search. Does not meet WP:GNG.Fbiagent010 (talk) 07:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.