Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph R. Garber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Result was Keep. — Caknuck 16:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph R. Garber[edit]

Non-notable author whose best claim to fame is a rumor that one of his books was almost turned into a movie but not produced. {notability} tagged since Sept. 06. Savidan 04:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, books have been reviewed in major media, not exceptionally favorably: an international best-seller that almost no-one remembers, for example. SF Chronicle obit --Dhartung | Talk 05:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Multiple references, highly published in Forbes. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 07:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: If your book is reviewed in the New York Times, I think that justifies being included. Bradybd 08:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It could stand more meat on its bones, but the references already present meet the minimal requirements.--Mike18xx 08:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

keep per Bradybd - however needs a decent rewrite. Guroadrunner 22:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment What are your specific concerns given Richard Arthur Norton and my changes since nomination? --Dhartung | Talk 23:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.