Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Initial D First Stage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. Material is already at Initial D, so merging isn't necessary.Cúchullain ^t/c 03:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Initial D First Stage[edit]

Initial D Second Stage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Initial D Third Stage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Initial D Fourth Stage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Duplicate of section at Initial D. If this needs to be split (which it doesn't, it should be dealt with at the article page first. If deciding to keep one version or another, the main article section is both more accurate and less original research Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 18:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added additional articles that follow the exact same format of redundancy. Akin to having "Show x Season 1" "Show x Season 2" etc.... --Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 18:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Normally I'd say merge into Initial D, but as all the content is already there, its irrelevent. As they contain nothing more than plot summaries, there is no need for seperate articles. Tx17777 (talk) 21:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since all of the articles are just plot summary, which goes against WP:NOT#PLOT. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 20:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.