Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Improterapia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as spam (per SNOW). Username blocked as spam. Alexf^(talk) 10:49, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improterapia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable technique with only trivial coverage CTJF83 chat 04:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete also appears to be a bit on the promotional side. Eeekster (talk) 04:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sources, hardly even an article. SteveStrummer (talk) 13:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Classic promotional article, written by User:Improterapia, imparting little information other than that this is a improterapia is a good thing, it can't be explained in the article, but follow the links to how you too can learn more about improterapia and about Erik Rodriguez. Worth looking at the imdb.com link to Rodriguez before this is deleted, it's classic as well. Mandsford 15:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam / OR Toddst1 (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.