Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idharkuthane Aasaipattai Balakumara
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 17:12, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Idharkuthane Aasaipattai Balakumara[edit]
- Idharkuthane Aasaipattai Balakumara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication that this film has started shooting so fails WP:NFF and WP:BALL LGA (was LightGreenApple) talk to me 10:48, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy back to its author. While the planned film does have some coverage in reliable sources, it does not have anyway near enough to qualify as an exception to WP:NFF. Topic is simply TOO SOON for a separate article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 02:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per significant coverage. NickCochrane (talk) 03:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.