Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Society and Its Environment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Human Society and Its Environment[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to be a course syllabus, which fails WP:N and probably WP:C. - Guillaume Faye-Bédrin (talk) 19:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding:

Technological and Applied Studies
Personal Development, Health and Physical Education
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Added two more articles from the same user here, I'm rather baffled why we would want articles on a single state's curricula, sourced only the state education authority. Expand New_South_Wales#Education with brief summaries, but don't do this. Reywas92^Talk 20:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Also we are basically copying (or closely paraphrasing) all of the text from the authority: there is not a lot of value in us maintaining as seperate documents, when it would serve the teachers and others users of the material much better to get it from the original source. I encourage the author @Smashskitten: to check out Wikidata:Wikidata_for_Education: a much bettter thing to do with the material from the standards, would be to map key concepts against Wikidata, so we can do things like improve existing Wikipedia articles that match the things the students need to learn. Sadads (talk) 12:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all WP:NOTGUIDE also applies besides being a blatant copy and paste. LibStar (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This article is in need of cleanup, but the course itself seems to be the subject of a some academic study and critique. Such sources include "Some issues arising in NSW human society and its environment for primary schools", a journal article about the course; and "Forum: Geography and Geographical Education in New South Wales, Australia", a 2006 journal article discussing the course's teachings of geography. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.