Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher Education (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was The result was KEEP, additional expansion of article and discussion indicate that additional coverage of the novel meets Wikipedia:Notability (books), Sadads (talk) 14:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Higher Education (novel)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable book I+delete+things+alot (talk) 16:05, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and speedy close. The ISFDB page for this novel lists enough reviews to establish the coverage that demonstrates notability. The nom has apparently ignored the requirements of WP:BEFORE and displays a curious interest in deleting the works of a rather notable author. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 23:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm running into issues with a lot of the sources being offline, as the book was published back in 1996. (The article listed '95, but everything I've found said that it came out the following year.) I am finding quite a few things coming up in snippet view in Google Books ([1], [2]) but so far I've found enough to where it could be considered a keep. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.