Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamshakal's
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 16:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hamshakal's[edit]
- Hamshakal's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Film hasn't started shooting yet. Sources that I can find basically say that there's going to be a film by this name, and that it will start shooting in September. WP:TOOSOON applies. ... discospinster talk 21:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Undersourced article about upcoming film which hasn't commenced principal photography; fails WP:NFF. AllyD (talk) 21:08, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per TOO SOON. Under WP:NFF, this topic does not yet merit a separate article... but as it is beginning to be spoken of in sources, this title can be in the meawhile be redirected to and discussed and sourced in the director's article until meriting a separate article, . Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.