Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gretchen Wieners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Mean Girls. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gretchen Wieners[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Character shows no evidence of standalone notability and the article is mostly unsourced and written as fan blog. No sources with in-depth character discussion exist, all of her mentions come from sex appeal listicles. Character fails WP:SIGCOV and WP: NCHAR. Propose redirect as it can be described in a parent article, such as a list of characters. FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect the usable content. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish)} 15:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Film. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. Nothing in the article suggests this meets WP:GNG. But the nom should clearly report on their BEFORE. GScholar shows some mentions in passing, at minimum, so there is a chance something could be dug up to rescue this. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:23, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete missing indicators of WP:GNG, which needs more than passing mentions. Redirect is a valid WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:06, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There can't be a Merge or Redirect if no one specifies a target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Mean Girls (2004 film) is a plausible merge/redirect target, this character is mentioned 4 times there. VickKiang (talk) 22:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mean Girls. I found no evidence that the subject meets GNG. Please ping me if good sources are located. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.