Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geographical distribution of English speakers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to from List of countries by English-speaking population. Sandstein 17:12, 19 June 2019 (UTC) - Amended, Sandstein 13:24, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geographical distribution of English speakers[edit]

Geographical distribution of English speakers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant to List of countries by English-speaking population. Interstellarity T 🌟 11:42, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Interstellarity:, @Rorshacma:, @Andrew Davidson: I created the article in question as part of a series of similar articles which used the same style as this one and focus on other languages such as Russian, German, Italian, Polish and Portuguese. There are significant differences between the article List of countries by English-speaking population and Geographical distribution of English speakers such as the clarity regarding the source, the population size and the source year which allow to constantly update the figures with the most recent sources. These improvements can't be found in the mentioned redudant article which is rather confusing. Deleting Geographical distribution of English speakers would result not only in a loss regarding the series of article, but also in the effort put in searching the most appropriate source for every country, for which I did some research myself. I would instead consider leaving them both, or merging List of countries by English-speaking population into Geographical distribution of English speakers being the latter more updated, reliable and recent.FrankCesco26 (talk) 11:32, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@FrankCesco26: Go right ahead. I'm OK with it. Interstellarity T 🌟 11:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 06:50, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.