Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake
Articles for deletion/Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NGAME. Not enough coverage in reliable secondary sources. Does not need its own article. Clear friend a ^💬 02:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets WP:GNG, articles by reliable sources Destructoid (by staff editor see: [1]), Hardcore Gaming 101, plus Japanese language version of the article lists 2 print reviews: [2] - Mika1h (talk) 10:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's also this Italian magazine that seems to have reviewed the game: [3] - Mika1h (talk) 10:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And here's a short review in a Spanish magazine: [4] - Mika1h (talk) 10:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as above, there are several secondary sources that refer to the game. Oz346 (talk) 10:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very clear evidence that the article passes WP:GNG. I would suggest the nominator withdraw. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above, meets GNG Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are sources talking about the game out there, which pretty much establish that it's a notable game. It's just that the article is poorly structured but can be improved. Roberth Martinez (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.