Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Plan (1997 film) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator‎. (non-admin closure) InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Family Plan (1997 film)[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NFO, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:SIGCOV. All the references in the article are mere mentions about this film. I did a WP:BEFORE and found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I also found nothing suitable, reliable and in-depth enough to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 20:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 20:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added a few reviews to the page. Keep. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, newly added sources pass WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 02:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per added sources. Toughpigs (talk) 17:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, easily sourceable, blatant lack of WP:BEFORE. --Cavarrone 23:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw this nomination. Apparently, I need to practice WP:BEFORE more carefully. I vow not to nominate any film articles for the rest of 2024. The Film Creator (talk) 02:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.