Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facternet
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Just non-notable. Sr13 03:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Facternet[edit]
A non-notable online service provider. Article has WP:NPOV and WP:COI problems as well, as indicated by the use of the first person. Realizing that NPOV/COI issues alone aren't a good reason to delete, I made a good-faith effort to find sources, doing various Lexis-Nexis sources for "Facternet" in the text of articles in "European News Sources", "Major Papers", "Business News", etc... all of which turned up zero hits. Similarly for Google searches restricting to cnn.com or bbc.co.uk. It does get 29,000 google hits, but searching the first few pages yielded no reliable third party sources. I initially tagged as db-spam, but tag removed without comment. Two prior speedy deletions, one A7, one G11. Delete - Aagtbdfoua 23:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I see no real notability and it has many problems. Reywas92TalkReview me 22:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable article, no reliable sources. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 05:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.