Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EnergyCS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EnergyCS[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and the general notability guidelines. The only dedicated coverage this company ever received by reliable sources was about its 2011 acquisition by the now-defunct Coda Automotive. (NCORP specifically mentions acquisitions an example of trivial coverage). Other than that, the company received only passing mentions by news articles about the electric vehicle industry in the 2000s. Tserton (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology. Tserton (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Promotional with no evidences of notability. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with what's already been written. MaskedSinger (talk) 07:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.