Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enda Caldwell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Enda Caldwell[edit]
- Enda Caldwell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:BIO. JaGatalk 02:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep At least two of the references are independent and reliable, so Enda meets the WP:GNG. - Mgm|(talk) 11:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What about WP:ENTERTAINER under WP:BIO, though? --JaGatalk 17:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The references may be independent and reliable but the coverage on independent sources does not appear to go beyond non trivial. Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- even if kept most of the content appears to be mostly Original Research unsuported by sources and should be removed. and references to Enda should be changed to Caldwell Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, I am a new user and wish to try and clean up the article so can you please make the necesssary changes to the article in order to make it acceptible? Enda Caldwell--Enda Caldwell (talk) 17:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Hi, to prove the audience for my radio program is huge - my voice is the nightime station imaging voice on FM104 who maintained it's position as the most listened to local radio station in the Dublin market with a listened yesterday figure of 20% (+1)in the most recent JNLR results found here: [1] And in my past shows on stations like Atlantic 252 I had an average quarter hour listenership of 70,000+ people in UK in 2001. On Today FM I also achieved record audiences of 26,000 adults average quarter hour performance for Planet Hits which I presented from 2001-2002. And a further 18,000 average quarter hour for Nothin' But 90's on Today FM from 2003-2005. The average quarter hour means a sample of the estimated amount of listeners at any random 15 minute period during any one of my programmes at the time of broadcast. I would be most notably remembered for my on air performances at Atlantic 252 and Today FM and also being one of the only Irish Radio Personalities ever to present shows for RTL Group and Radio Luxembourg. I have achieved some noteriety for being the last ever live presenter to say the words Atlantic 252 on 20th December 2001. The station had 1 million listeners + at that point. I hope that this helps my case. Thank you. [[User:Enda Caldwell|Enda Caldwell]--Enda Caldwell (talk) 00:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - appears, per nom, to fail WP:BIO. The secondary sources provided seem to constitute "passing references" to the subject and would therefore appear to fail "significant coverage". The rest of the article seems to rely on primary sources (or no sources other than the author/subject himself) and would seem to have quite significant issues under WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI. Guliolopez (talk) 12:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Shameless self promotion, total COI. Snappy (talk) 11:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per MGM. WP:COI is not grounds for deleting an article. Sources in the article provide adequate coverage to justify an article on this apparently well-known radio personality. JulesH (talk) 10:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.