Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Asunción

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2024 February 8.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of the United States, Asunción[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The scant information on the embassy building, which appears entirely unremarkable, has already been included in Paraguay–United States relations, of which this is a content fork. Biruitorul ^Talk 09:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete yet another content fork of the bilateral relations article. LibStar (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Paraguay, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:GNG. There are several articles from reliable sources that devote significant coverage to the embassy (the building): ÚH 1, ÚH 2, ÚH 3, ÚH 4, ÚH 5, La Nación, Hoy. Pilaz (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging LibStar to see if the new sources found seem convincing. Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Quito. Pilaz (talk) 19:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The installation of an air-quality monitor on the roof of the embassy is not, I would submit, an indication of notability, but of the fact that not much happens in Paraguay. — Biruitorul ^Talk 20:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind the history of the embassy building: this peer-reviewed article for the old embassy designed by architect Chloethiel Woodard Smith, this piece contextualizing the construction of the 1959 embassy La Nación, or this in-depth piece published in ABC Paraguay looking at the design of the new embassy. Pilaz (talk) 22:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Pilaz – Kjerish (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  see WP:PERX. LibStar (talk) 23:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  @LibStar: your impression on the sources I dug up? Pilaz (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Paraguay–United States relations. The discussion about the notability of the building above is beside the point, because the actual article is not at all about the building, but about Paraguay–United States relations, and therefore a WP:CFORK. Sandstein 08:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Paraguay–United States relations. Sandstein is correct that the article is about the relations of the US and Paraguay. On its own, that wouldn't be a reason for Wikipedia not to have an article on the embassy, but there's essentially no information available on the embassy itself by reliable sources, which is very much a reason. Tserton (talk) 08:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.