Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elian Script

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to pigpen cipher. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Elian Script

Elian Script (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to actually support this is independently notable and with substance, searches easily found nothing at all aside from a few listings, so there's nothing for a better article accepted in our standards. Article has existed for months now without actual improvements. SwisterTwister talk 18:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

• Redirect to pigpen cipher. Available sources are all heavily weighted towards self-promotion; no independent in-depth coverage seems to exist.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
• Redirect as suggested, per WP:CHEAP. Bearian (talk) 16:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
• Redirect and merge into Pigpen cipher. --mach 🙈🙉🙊 17:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
• I've added external sources from magazines, radio, and YouTube (not done by C.C. Elian _ please see edits); what is missing are illustrations which I should be able to find soon and add.Griffinxyz (talk) 12:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
• I also took away the reference to the PigPen cipher as the source because that isn't true. The artist C.C. Elian has clarified this multiple times: Griffinxyz (talk) 12:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

References

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.