Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eco-chauvinism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eco-chauvinism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a neologism with next to no coverage in sources that I could identify through a Google search. Fails WP:NEO and WP:GNG. Note that the only cited source does not mention this term. Everymorning talk 18:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 18:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 18:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – per nom. Couldn't find any evidence that this has any currency. – Margin1522 (talk) 20:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Doublefrog (talk) 05:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It seems a less flattering synonym for Ecocentrism (or maybe Biocentrism (ethics)). I don't know if a redirect is warranted. Colapeninsula (talk) 12:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Ecocentrism. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Even using different search phrases related to this, nothing came up. Ormr2014 (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:NOTNEO. A meta-neologism of sorts, repurposing 'chauvinism' to apply to a different topic. Biggest results in google search are PhysicsWiki's article on Neologism (which has an entry in a list for eco-chauvinism, apparently copied and pasted from this article, and a few forums and personal websites. ― Padenton|✉ 18:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.