Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreieck Potsdam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all articles linked here. However, since all but Dreieck Potsdam were never formally listed or edited to include a notification of this debate, an admin may at least userfy any of the pages upon request. Any reinstated pages, as well as similar articles not discussed, will need to be properly renominated. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dreieck Potsdam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a series of articles by this same editor about a bunch of non-notable freeway interchanges. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:08, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the result of this is delete, articles about other non-notable interchanges should also be deleted:

Kreuz Schweinfurt/Werneck
Dreieck Bayreuth/Kulmbach
Kreuz Bamberg
Dreieck Südharz
Dreieck Nürnberg/Feucht
Dreieck Karlsruhe
Dreieck Parthenaue
Hattenbacher Dreieck
Kirchheimer Dreieck
Dreieck Nossen
In fact, it looks like all the articles in Category:Road interchanges in Germany might need to go away. Simply because something exists doesn't make it notable. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other articles recently created by the same editor with the same deficiencies also include, in addition to the ones noted above:

Anything else in the aforementioned category pre-dates his recent creation spree. That said, I say delete all of these. They fail to meet our notability standards at this time. Imzadi 1979 → 09:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dreieck Darmstadt and Dreieck Darmstadt/Griesheim were also made by the same editor, and also should be deleted with the others for the same reasons. Imzadi 1979 → 23:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - Wikipedia has articles on roads, where these interchanges are mentioned, stand-alone articles are unwarranted, except some coverage of the particular interchange can be shown. None of these articles have any refs, though. Kraxler (talk) 16:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per WP:GNG, WP:NOTDIR. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 19:40, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all which are completely unreferenced and relist remaining ones if any. No prejudice against WP:REFUND to non-article space so an editor can improve the existing pages to the point that they will survive a deletion discussion. Delete any categories which are emptied and check for "parent" categories which might become empty as a result of a category being deleted and delete those as well. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.