Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Ferregui

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Outside of confirmed sockpuppets, nobody wanted to keep the article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:25, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas Ferregui[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, no coverage available in reliable sources, pretty clearly an autobiography to boot. Insufficient significant roles in notable works to meet WP:NACTOR. Recreation of an article repeatedly declined at AfC. Originally PRODed by me, dePROD by an IP editor who proceeded to refbomb the article with citations to sources that do not mention the subject, with the exception of this mere mention that quotes the subject [1]. As this article has been repeatedly recreated and deleted twice by A7 already, I believe that if we have a consensus to delete we should also salt the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources found; only independent source is an IMDb page. Luke (talk) 00:17, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - We can be charitable and say it's too soon for an article on this actor's budding career, but the nominator found evidence of a dogged promotional effort. The article is currently ref-bombed with either retail listings, industry directory entries, or articles about things he was in that merely list him as being present, if that much. All I can find (in any language) is more of the same. Perhaps he will become notable in time, but now is not the time to force a WP article into existence. Salt if admins consider it necessary. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notorious artist in Latin culture. The article has several Brazilian newspapers as sources. Montila (talk) 10:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The artist has years of career, accumulated work, was part of the cast of one of the largest franchises of Disney. Besides actor has a career in the music industry. It is part of popular culture. ana da hora (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Although not as influential in the United States, he is influential in his native country. It is noted in other wikipedia languages, all Latin. pottermoreusa (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser note: Sock puppet votes struck. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The pervasive sockpuppetting is further evidence that we need to salt this article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:02, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Não Faça Isso Comigo and add WP:SALT. He is the main character for this film which may or may not be notable, as long as there is a major mention his name will be looked up. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominated that article for PROD as well, 2 out of 3 of the sources are outright fakes (and the 3rd is a database). The account that created that article and this one as well is pretty clearly NOTHERE and was using Wikipedia as a means for self-promotion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:40, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and WP:SALT this page then per the arguments given. That PROD isn't going to last though if what you say is true. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:48, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

well, we'll always have AfD. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:53, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.