Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixie Chicken (bar)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 February 3.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dixie Chicken (bar)[edit]

No notability, no relevence, and almost no information of any sort, now that the unverifiable stuff has been deleted. There has also been absolutely no improvement, or apparent capacity for improvement, since the last cleanup. LSD (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unnotable and not something to even merge to the CS article as it isn't a tax district or the like. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 21:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in agreement with the nominator. Drmies (talk) 00:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An article which uses Playboy magazine as a reference fails notability, I think. Not enough WP:RS --Artene50 (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.