Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Didihat district

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Didihat district[edit]

Didihat district (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of those articles about "proposed" districts that apparently never became a thing. Wikipedia is not a repository for non-notable "proposals." Aintabli (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following articles, because they all pertain to the same problem:
Ranikhet district (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Kotdwar district (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yamunotri district (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Aintabli (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They are notable proposals. — Hemant Dabral (📞) 04:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all nominated entries. Per WP:NGEO, Populated places without legal recognition are considered on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the GNG. In this case, a mention in one article does not meet WP:GNG. Moreover, we should avoid creating permastubs which will never be improved because the district never actually existed. Broc (talk) 15:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, I'd like to see more support when closing a bundled nomination and there is a Merge suggestion though to a nonexistent article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Do not meet WP:GNG. Articles can be recreated if these districts are created someday. Arnav Bhate (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.