Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dabangg 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 16:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dabangg 3[edit]
- Dabangg 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Future film without any reliable sources. The source is about Dabangg 2 which is not related here. This film is not yet confirmed by producers and directors. The article clearly fails WP:NFF. Tolly4bolly 17:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFF: No indication they've started principal photography. As of May 7, 2013 they still didn't even have a script for the project. Maybe information on this upcoming project could be discussed in Dabangg or Dabangg 2, but at this time doesn't merit its own article. Does not meet the grounds for an exception suggested in WP:FFNOTE: there's very little coverage out there. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 20:07, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:23, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:23, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per being TOO SOON. Always fine to have sourced discussion of it in the director's or related articles, but it does not yet merit a separate article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:04, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: lack of reliable sources should not be an issue, since there are lots of newspaper articles out in web, but, ya it is WP:TOOSOON. --Tito Dutta (contact) 22:33, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.