Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYAW

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Aliw Broadcasting Corporation#Radio. Viable ATD with no indication further input is forthcoming Star Mississippi 02:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYAW[edit]

DYAW (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in RS. Could be redirected to Aliw Broadcasting Corporation. MarioGom (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. MarioGom (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: All the sources in the article are reliable. The first source states that the station is licensed. The second source talks about the station. The rest of the sources talk about the station's programming. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG😎🙃 09:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    A mere primary record like the initial sources can be reliable, but it is not a secondary source and it does not provide significant coverage. Which source provides significant coverage about DYAW? MarioGom (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The second source is indeed a secondary source. And so are the last two. Those 3 therefore provide WP:SIGCOV to the subject. I have explained more than enough. And I won't respond to this post again. ASTIG😎🙃 09:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Source 2 is exactly the opposite of significant coverage, it is a passing mention in routine coverage. The source just states [...] Aliw Media Group chairman, and Dr. Nicomedes Abia [...] of Lamrag Radio Network jointly sign an agreement for the launch and inaugural of radio 89.9 DYAW, provincial station of Karambola and radio station DWIZ in Tacloban City. That does not addresses the topic directly and in detail (WP:SIGCOV). MarioGom (talk) 12:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Aliw Broadcasting Corporation#Radio per nom, due to failure of WP:SIGCOV. I've reviewed all four of the references in the current version of the article: #1 is a government database chart listing, #2 is precisely as described by MarioGom above, #3 is a dead link but the title of the citation implies it's an obituary about a late broadcaster, and not directly about the station itself, and #4 is a passing mention. Left guide (talk) 10:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Meets WP:GNG per Astig's argument. Sources mentioned are reliable enough and secondary, with the ones mentioned by Astig in-depth IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 23:58, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Would you be able to point to an independent, secondary, realiable source with significant coverage? MarioGom (talk) 10:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Source 2 is an independent, secondary, realiable source that has WP:SIGCOV since it's about the station. So are sources 3 and 4 since it's about the station's programming. SBKSPP (talk) 03:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Aliw Broadcasting Corporation#Radio: Fails GNG and NORG/CORP. Found nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Agree with above, the refs are not SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk  13:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep Meets WP:GNG to me Jothefiredragon (talk) 08:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, arguments divided between Keep and Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per above. Additional analysis of source material available on this subject would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.