Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberworthiness
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Cyber resilience. ✗plicit 03:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Cyberworthiness[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cyberworthiness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see a need for a standalone article apart from cyber resilience. The context is lacking and this seems like an unestablished Australian? neologism. TadejM my talk 02:17, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Computing, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to cyber resilience. I did find this paper: [1] and some conference proceedings mentioning the word. It seems to be mostly used in military contexts, in Australia, so it might be a distinct enough topic (or have distinct enough usage) to mention in the cyber resilience article, but probably isn't worth its own article. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per WeirdNAnnoyed. Owen× ☎ 17:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.