Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crestfallen (communication)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Crestfallen (communication)[edit]
- Crestfallen (communication) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is nothing more than a simple dictionary definition - already done much better on Wiktionary. Biker Biker (talk) 09:40, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although not that bad, an article on the topic of being crestfallen should be possible but it probably would not be under that title, this one is really about the expression not the state so fails WP:Not a dictionary.Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Kitfoxxe. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:47, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.