Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contract (BDSM)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to BDSM. SarahStierch (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contract (BDSM)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed without explanation; the added reference is not to a reliable source. This is one of many BDSM articles (a walled garden with a "Total Power Exchange" sign on it) without proper referencing: it's a non-notable term. Drmies (talk) 02:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom (to the extent that the term is genuinely encyclopedically notable, it is covered in BDSM). AndreasKolbe JN 466 17:19, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that's precisely it, and that goes for a lot of terms in that little garden. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 18:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge content - to a more general BDSM article. Not notable on it's own (per lack of applicable references) but there is some information worth noting (specifically the issues of "consent" as a defense in court). Achowat (talk) 13:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Glossary of BDSM or BDSM. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.