Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City Cab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 06:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

City Cab[edit]

A large fleet but no special features and no secondary sources to establish notability. Nothing to differentiate from other large taxi firms. Delete. BlueValour 22:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete What's to distinguish it from, say, City Cab of Eureka, California?--Ispy1981 23:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 23:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 00:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 00:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'd say speedy, unless someone wants to construe their claimed number of taxis as an assertion of notability. Someguy1221 20:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this article started as an advert. When that element was removed there was virtually nothing left. The business may be large enough to be notable, but if so, a propert article should be written. Therefore do not salt. Peterkingiron 22:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless there is some feasible way of expanding. The article doesn't cite any sources. Also, per WP:NOTABILITY, as a Google search reveals only the company's website.Bwowen 02:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.