Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christiano (footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 14:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christiano (footballer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG and barely passes WP:NFOOTY due to a Campeonato Pernambucano appearance. Has no further professional career after this, and has no significant coverage whatsoever. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - young player who meets NFOOTBALL and seemingly has ongoing career, and we have always allowed players in that position more leeway re:GNG. GiantSnowman 11:43, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- All were at one time, and notability is not temporary. It would make more sense to allow leeway for footballers who have retired or are no longer playing at professional level, as it can take time to find significant coverage. Peter James (talk) 12:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Doesn´t matter if he has played one game or 100 games, passing WP:NFOOTY only means that the subject is likely to meet the general notability guideline. He still has to meet it and if there is no WP:SIGCOV then he fails. Alvaldi (talk) 12:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GS: one fully-pro appearance and is only 20 years old. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 00:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes NFOOTY as the player made one apperance in a professional league.Poppified ^talk 06:07, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.