Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choe Ju-song

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Choe Ju-song[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 22:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 22:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. My response to all these nominations is that redirection is better than deletion. In this case, however, the Korean Wikipedia has an article about a different person born in 1910 with the same or a similar name at ko:최주성. The 1910 person's notability comes from a listing in a directory of pro-Japanese Koreans and from being a book author – or perhaps more than one person's biography has been smooshed together by VIAF. Perhaps someone with better knowledge of Korea and Korean could build an English article from the corresponding Korean Wikipedia article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
North Korean footballers won't have coverage in South Korea sources, no matter how much we look. Oaktree b (talk) 00:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is the best I can find [1], it's a match report. One line mentions don't help notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NSPORT due to a lack of secondary coverage. Trivial mentions in match reports don't contribute to notability. User:Let'srun 03:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.