Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheerleader Ninjas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheerleader Ninjas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. The appropriate guidelines are Wikipedia:Notability (films). Article was created in 2006, and has been tagged {{unreferenced}} since 2008. HairyWombat 00:50, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd suggest merging to the page on its star Kira Reed, but I'm not sure she's notable. I found someone claiming[1] that Ninja Cheerleaders is a remake of this film. If so, a merge there might be in order. But I've spent enough time googling this. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:35, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. There's not a lot out there for this film, but it has received reviews from Film Threat and the Tri-City Herald. The encyclopedia it's mentioned in does count for something, although it's brief and is written by a Film Threat editor. Not the same one, though. It's just enough to where I can muster a weak keep at best, although part of me wouldn't protest too hard if it's deleted. There might be some merit in merging it with the article on Ninja Cheerleaders if it's 100% certain that it's a remake of that film. It does have similar titles, but other than the one source saying it's a remake I'm not really seeing anything that confirms it's a remake so far. I think it might have been more speculation on that one source's part than any actual confirmation. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I copied this article to wikialpha in case it gets deleted here. Mathewignash (talk) 16:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep per just squeaking up on WP:NF. While certainly this thing has lots of coverage in a less-than-reliable sources, the improvements by Colapeninsula and Tokyogirl79 are just enough. We do not expect nor demand that any low budget indie would have the same level of media coverage as big budget studio blockbusters. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 00:26, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per significant coverage. LenaLeonard (talk) 20:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.