Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chang Tsung-Che

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Star Mississippi 01:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chang Tsung-Che[edit]

Chang Tsung-Che (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a diplomat who does not appear notable. Most ambassadors are not notable but this person is not even an ambassador, just a career diplomat. Mccapra (talk) 21:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Draftify as requested by the creator per the insufficient coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The subject does not pass Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria, which says:

    People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.

    • If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
    Sources
    1. Xie, Ruxin 謝如欣 (2022-06-28). "台宏外交人事牽動 駐巴西代表張崇哲轉調葡萄牙" [Taiwanese diplomats are affected by personnel matters, and Representative Chang Tsung-Che in Brazil is transferred to Portugal]. Liberty Times (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2024-01-28. Retrieved 2024-01-28.

      This source provides the most coverage about him but is not sufficient to establish notability in conjunction with the other sources, which provide little biographical coverage. The article notes from Google Translate: "Chang Tsung-Che, who loves movies, took office as director of the Taipei Cultural Office of São Paulo in 2018. He took the lead in cooperating with the Film School of the University of São Paulo to organize a Taiwan Film Exhibition, hoping to let the Brazilian people better understand Taiwan through movies. ... Different from ordinary diplomats, Chang Tsung-Che is also a literary and historical worker. During his tenure in St. Paul, he visited Muyi City in the suburbs where the six pioneer Taiwanese immigrant families are located many times. He conducted field investigations on the history of Taiwanese immigration and conducted research on it many times."

    2. Moura, Nelson (2022-11-19). "Interview with Taiwan envoy in Portugal, Chang Tsung-che". Taiwan News. Archived from the original on 2024-01-28. Retrieved 2024-01-28.

      The article notes: "The former official representative of Taiwan in Sao Tome and Príncipe and in Brazil, Chang Tsung-che (張崇哲) was named the "de facto" ambassador of Taiwan in Portugal in July. In this interview, Tsung describes the history of the Taiwanese community in Portugal, the main challenges faced by the community, and possible spaces for cooperation between the island and Portugal in the areas of tourism, technology and business."

    3. I checked the sources in zh:張崇哲 and did not find significant coverage about him. The sources were from non-independent sources like his employer, the government of Taiwan, or contained solely interview quotes from him.
    There is insufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Chang Tsung-Che (traditional Chinese: 張崇哲; simplified Chinese: 张崇哲) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    A move to draft will allow the creator, 方志維 (talk · contribs), to continue searching for sources about Chang Tsung-Che.

    Cunard (talk) 02:34, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your !vote doesn’t make sense. Cunard is saying the sources are inadequate. Mccapra (talk) 05:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry changed. 1.46.159.106 (talk) 12:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.