Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ché OVNI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley 00:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ché OVNI[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is not notable from what I find through research. If you can prove otherwise, please do! The please help by expanding this article, in seven days if nothing is proven, it will be deleted. Thanks! Aeroplanepics0112 (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ Keep and allow this suitable stub to be improved over time and through regular editing. My own research finds that even if unknown in the United States and, even if available sources are not(all) being used, this Argentinian film appears to meet WP:NF. Though released in 1968, it apparently has Spanish-language (and some Italian-language) mentions in more recent news articles[1] and books,[2] hinting that it made enough of an impact 45 years ago to be memorable even today. Point here being that we do not expect that a 45-year-old Argentinian film would have current coverage and I am unable to find online archives of Argentinian newspapers from 1968. Will need input from Argentinian and Spanish-reading Wikipedians. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:08, 6 February 2013 (UTC) (UPPED from "Weak") Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.}[reply]
Keep as it is almost undoubted that sources exist offline. Argentinian newspapers from the 60s are not going to be online, so the fact that there is little online does not mean that the subject is not notable. It can still be further developed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Already meets WP:NF. Can somebody figure out what is being said here, it mentions something in Spanish about a publicity stunt.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 09:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.