Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Labrada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. L Faraone 19:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Labrada[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and United States of America. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources below which show notability. Yes, it's all "look at this Mexican playing for Virgin Islands", but it's enough. Giant Snowman 21:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - @GiantSnowman:, I found [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and [7] among many more sources. Clearly significant figure in US Virgin Islands football with ongoing career abroad and internationally capped. Article need improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets GNG per Luz Noticias and Medio Tiempo etc Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets GNG, and I've expanded the article somewhat to include the information provided above. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 20:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- per source found above by Das osmnezz, it significant enough to pass notability.Epcc12345 (talk) 01:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:GNG Lightburst (talk) 15:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.