Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Azar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 23:58, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Carlos Azar[edit]
- Carlos Azar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I earlier deleted an AfC of this as copyvio of his web site and promotional. This is less so, but I think the key question is whether the 2007 award is sufficient for notability DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:43, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 01:08, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable musician, should be deleted. Koala15 (talk) 00:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a bit of coverage here, although it has a promotional feel to it. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 07:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 03:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. A lack evidence award is major. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:25, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per the above. The award is notable enough (barely, I think) to have an article at Murex d'Or, but does not appear to be a huge deal outside of Lebanon. That said, the subject is still active in the industry, and (as per WP:USUAL) may end up with a notable role in a notable project. If that ends up being the case, an article might be appropriate. I just don't think we're there yet. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.