Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlameBush!
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BlameBush![edit]
AfDs for this article:
Non-notable blog fails WP:WEB. Moon of the Child 06:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy delete under A7, tagging in a moment. Kwsn(Ni!) 06:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I proded this but it was contested. At any event, delete, speedy if possible as unnotable blog that fails WP:WEB. Eusebeus 09:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not even attempt to meet WP:WEB. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 09:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is it non-notable if it has received attention in the "Best of the Web" article on OpinionJournal, which is published by a newspaper journalist who is notable enough for his own Wiki article? If not, where would I have to find a reference to it? --Pellucid 17:02, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete You're apparently referring to James Taranto's "Best of the Web Today" column, which is published five times a week and links to about a dozen different sites each day. No, I don't believe that being among the hundreds of sites mentioned in that column makes it notable. --Highwired Huey 18:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WEB.--JForget 00:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per nom. Q T C 00:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.