Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Being Ginger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will userfy upon request Mark Arsten (talk) 02:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Being Ginger[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unable to find reliable sources sufficient to satisfy WP:MOVIE. Andrew³²⁷ 19:17, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable - there's a little coverage[1] but not enough for general or film guidelines. Maybe after release it will become notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to insufficient coverage from reliable sources about this topic. The link that Colapeninsula shared above is a good start, but we basically need to see if this film gets solid coverage upon release. If it does, no problem with recreating the article for this topic. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Userfy. It's just a little too soon for this to merit its own article. I have no problem with it getting userfied, but so far there isn't much. I'd say incubate, but I'm finding some things that suggest that this has been in production for years now and I'm not sure that this will really ever get completed or get that coverage it needs.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.