Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barakoti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barakoti[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. (A PROD was removed without any reason being given.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The prod was removed by the same editor that added it. GB fan 00:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article was created by a troll account (account shares same name, used ip account to contest speedy) Avono (talk) 23:13, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

note there were previous claims of notability mentioned in the article but I removed them because there were unsourced. Avono (talk) 23:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because it is one sentence. MiracleMat (talk) 02:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think we need reliable sources saying why this subject is notable. My sweeps of India-related media, world media, US news did not reveal anything that might indicate this subject meets the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:03, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.