Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BDSM: It's Not What You Think!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete . Rumors of secondary source coverage prove greatly exaggerated. Shii (tock) 04:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BDSM: It's Not What You Think![edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable documentary that relies on primary sources. It fails WP:NFILMS, as it lacks critical reviews, awards, or wide release. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Student project basically. Could not find independent sources. jni (talk) 08:37, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and thus WP:NF. While it can be verified that the thing has screened, it does not help that many of the article's refs are deadlinks.Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, appears to have received a nice amount of secondary source coverage. — Cirt (talk) 16:48, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 05:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.