Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analog loophole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Analog hole. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Analog loophole[edit]

I think this is redundant due to the presence of Analog Hole Anshuk (talk) 07:52, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Originally created to link in with the Tunebite article but no longer used there as it merely replicated material from Analog hole and was thus orphaned. Lame Name (talk) 08:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 12:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Analog hole. I agree that this article is redundant and provides very little context. Analog hole gets the same point across, but goes into much more detail. Matt (talk) 17:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Analog hole. Plausible search term. Grandmartin11 (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Analog hole. Is there an echo in here?—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 20:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Analog hole (more detailed). Yes, I'm your echo. - Mgm|^(talk) 22:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.