Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aguamania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aguamania[edit]

Aguamania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:N or have a good WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article can be improved per WP:ATD. --NoonIcarus (talk) 17:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More discussion around the extent of sourcing for this article's subject would be helpful in attaining a consensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Keep Like it or not, there are dozens of articles about water-based amusement parks. This is no different from all the others MNewnham (talk) 19:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - as per the sources above, and the fact it is supposedly only one of two water parks in Valenzuela Mr Vili talk 01:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.