Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerokinesis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salting is generally not used unless there are numerous recreations. Sr13 02:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Aerokinesis[edit]
Delete and salt recreation. Additional reason in this case: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Doczilla 00:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Also delete Aerokinetic which redirects to Aerokinesis.
- Delete. The article provides no context besides a dictionary definition. However, I don't see the need for page protection. After all, the article has only been created once. Ali (t)(c) 00:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, maybe so. Too many of these power articles like electrokinesis have already undergone multiple deletions for me to remember the count on them all. Doczilla 01:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Oysterguitarist~Talk 01:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete possible neologism--mostly a term from fantasy gaming. JJL 01:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Haemo 01:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this ability to control the air with either the mind or body movments. -- Ekjon Lok 01:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per comments above Corpx 02:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Psychokinesis which covers the whole "mind over matter" thing in extreme detail. This is a somewhat widespread term with 16k Ghits (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) cab 02:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Neither Psychokinesis nor -kinesis (to which this was previously redirected) even mention aerokinesis, so neither would answer anyone's question about the topic. Doczilla 03:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per the nom and other various contributors. Also per the string of other nonsensical articles presented above. NSR77 TC 03:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per comments above. Lucky number 49 23:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.